Skip to content

Claude knows how to answer. datastandarddatastandardknows exactly where to look.

MCP connected

Illustrative conversation, not a live AI session. The example compares Blinkit and Instamart in Q4 FY26, including adjusted EBITDA figures and references to Eternal and Swiggy filings. The visual answer arrives progressively.

Claude
Illustrative demo
Ask Claude anything…
Why did Blinkit turn profitable while Instamart still lost ₹858 crore in Q4 FY26?

Blinkit’s mature markets are benefiting from stronger store economics, while Instamart is still absorbing underused network capacity.

Adjusted EBITDA₹ crore · March quarter
Illustrative segment adjusted EBITDA for Q4 FY25 and Q4 FY26, in crore rupees. The supporting filing references appear below this example.
BusinessQ4 FY25Q4 FY26
Blinkit−178+37
Instamart−840−858

Swiggy reports that Instamart’s contribution margin improved from −5.6% to −1.8%, even with roughly 40% store-capacity utilisation.

Original filings2 companies · 3 filing types

Eternal Limited

  • Shareholders’ letterQ4 FY26 · pp. 6, 8
  • Earnings-call transcriptQ4 FY26 · p. 2
  • Annual reportFY25 · p. 6

Swiggy Limited

  • Shareholders’ letterQ4 FY26 · pp. 7, 13–14
  • Earnings-call transcriptQ4 FY26 · p. 15
  • Annual reportFY26 · pp. 34–35

Illustrative Claude conversation · Not a live AI response · Adjusted EBITDA definitions may differ

No proof. No number.

Search across Indian company filings in Claude or ChatGPT.Check the filing and source context before relying on a finding.

Connect with Claude for Free

100 free calls Compare plans